Consult Red vs Yalantis: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Consult Red (4.3/5) edges ahead of Yalantis (3.9/5) overall. Consult Red is the better choice for connected-device consulting from a team with direct prior product-company engineering leadership. Yalantis is the stronger option for compliance-first architecture advisory for healthcare PCB-to-cloud programs. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Consult Red vs Yalantis: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Consult Red | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2003 | 2008 |
| HQ | Shipley, UK | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 220+ | 400–513 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Founded by five engineering leaders from Pace Micro, employee-owned since its 2020 rebrand from Red Embedded | Compliance-first full-cycle advisory from PCB design through firmware, cloud, and AI for medical device and healthcare programs |
| Pricing model | Consulting and product development engagements | Project-based full-cycle engineering engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | RTOS, Embedded Software, Cloud Platforms | C, C++, Rust |
| Industries served | Connected TV, IoT, Industrial, Pay TV / OTT | Medical devices, Healthcare, IoT hardware products |
Consult Red vs Yalantis: overview
Consult Red
Consult Red was founded in 2003 by five engineering leaders from Pace Micro, initially operating as Red Embedded before rebranding to Consult Red in February 2020. Headquartered at The Wave, Shipley, England, the firm has grown to more than 220 employees across four continents and transferred ownership to an Employee-Owned Trust, applying its embedded, hardware, and cloud technology experience to connected-device consulting across Connected TV, IoT, and industrial sectors. The founding team's direct engineering leadership background at Pace Micro, a real, named prior employer, gives its consulting credibility a specific origin story a buyer can trace.
Yalantis
Yalantis was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, with the company citing 513 engineers across hardware, firmware, software, AI, and DevOps practices, though some sources describe a distributed team of 400-plus specialists. Its medical device and healthcare advisory practice covers the full development cycle from PCB design and enclosure engineering through firmware, embedded software, and cloud platforms, with more than 150 IoT projects and 40 end-to-end deployments cited as its track record. Positioning itself as compliance-first is a specific claim relevant to a healthcare architecture review evaluating regulatory readiness.
Services and capabilities: Consult Red vs Yalantis
| Capability | Consult Red | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture review | ✓ | ✓ |
| Feasibility assessment | ✗ | ✗ |
| Functional safety consulting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Technical training | ✗ | ✗ |
| Expert-witness services | ✗ | ✗ |
| Hardware co-design | ✗ | ✗ |
| Medical device firmware | ✗ | ✓ |
| IoT connectivity | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Consult Red vs Yalantis
| Framework / platform | Consult Red | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| C | ✓ | ✓ |
| C++ | N/A | ✓ |
| RTOS | ✓ | N/A |
| ISO 26262 | N/A | N/A |
| IEC 61508 | N/A | N/A |
| MISRA C | N/A | N/A |
| FPGA | N/A | N/A |
| Embedded Linux | N/A | N/A |
| PCB Design | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Consult Red vs Yalantis
| Criterion | Consult Red | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Product development, Staff augmentation | Project-based full-cycle engineering |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Consult Red vs Yalantis
| Dimension | Consult Red | Yalantis |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Connected TV, IoT, Industrial | Medical devices, Healthcare, IoT hardware products |
| Best use cases | Connected TV or RDK-based embedded software consulting, IoT product architecture consulting from a team with product-company engineering leadership background | Compliance-first healthcare architecture advisory requiring PCB-to-cloud scope, IoT deployment feasibility assessment requiring AI integration |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Project-based full-cycle engineering |
Consult Red vs Yalantis: pros and cons
| Consult Red | |
|---|---|
| + | Founded by five engineering leaders from Pace Micro, a specific, verifiable prior employer that grounds the firm's founding expertise claim |
| + | 22 years of operating history, with employee ownership since its 2020 rebrand aligning staff incentives with long-term client relationships |
| + | 220-plus employees across four continents give substantial bench depth for concurrent consulting and development engagements |
| + | Connected TV and RDK-V/RDK-B specialization is a specific, differentiated niche within broader embedded consulting |
| - | Connected TV and OTT specialization is a narrower fit for a buyer whose product has no video or pay-TV component |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
| - | The 2020 rebrand from Red Embedded to Consult Red is worth confirming doesn't create confusion with unrelated firms using similar names |
| Yalantis | |
|---|---|
| + | More than 150 IoT projects with 40 end-to-end deployments cited as specific, checkable advisory track record |
| + | Full-cycle scope from PCB design through firmware, cloud, and AI reduces the number of vendors for a healthcare architecture review |
| + | 17 years of operating history with a large engineering team relative to most boutique advisory firms |
| + | Compliance-first positioning is a specific, relevant claim for regulated healthcare architecture consulting |
| - | Reported engineer counts vary between roughly 400 and 513 depending on source, worth confirming directly for a large advisory engagement |
| - | Medical device and healthcare focus is a narrower fit for advisory engagements in unrelated verticals |
| - | No published pricing or minimum engagement figure |
Who should choose Consult Red?
A typical fit: connected TV or RDK-based embedded software consulting.
Founded by five engineering leaders from Pace Micro, employee-owned since its 2020 rebrand from Red Embedded. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Connected TV, IoT, Industrial, Pay TV / OTT.
Who should choose Yalantis?
A typical fit: compliance-first healthcare architecture advisory requiring PCB-to-cloud scope.
Compliance-first full-cycle advisory from PCB design through firmware, cloud, and AI for medical device and healthcare programs. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Medical devices, Healthcare, IoT hardware products.
Decision matrix: Consult Red vs Yalantis
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Both offer fixed-price models |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Consult Red (Not published) vs Yalantis (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Consult Red |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Consult Red |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Consult Red |
Use case fit: Consult Red vs Yalantis
| Use case | Consult Red fit | Yalantis fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connected TV or RDK-based embedded software consulting | Strong | Limited | Consult Red |
| IoT product architecture consulting from a team with product-company engineering leadership background | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Compliance-first healthcare architecture advisory requiring PCB-to-cloud scope | Limited | Strong | Yalantis |
| IoT deployment feasibility assessment requiring AI integration | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Strong | Limited | Consult Red |
Verdict: Consult Red vs Yalantis
Consult Red (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Firmware Consulting projects. Founded by five engineering leaders from Pace Micro, employee-owned since its 2020 rebrand from Red Embedded.
Yalantis (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need IoT deployment feasibility assessment requiring AI integration. If your situation matches that, Yalantis is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Consult Red vs Yalantis FAQ
Is Consult Red better than Yalantis?
Consult Red (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Consult Red's strongest advantage: founded by five engineering leaders from Pace Micro, a specific, verifiable prior employer that grounds the firm's founding expertise claim. Yalantis's strongest advantage: more than 150 IoT projects with 40 end-to-end deployments cited as specific, checkable advisory track record.
How do Consult Red and Yalantis differ in pricing?
Consult Red uses consulting and product development engagements pricing. Yalantis uses project-based full-cycle engineering engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Consult Red or Yalantis?
Yalantis is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each consultancy before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Consult Red and Yalantis?
Consult Red's primary differentiator is: founded by five engineering leaders from Pace Micro, employee-owned since its 2020 rebrand from Red Embedded. Yalantis's primary differentiator is: compliance-first full-cycle advisory from PCB design through firmware, cloud, and AI for medical device and healthcare programs. They also differ in team size (220+ vs 400–513), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Connected TV, IoT vs Medical devices, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each consultancy before making a decision.